Previous Next


TIFF 6.0 Specification                                                                         Final—June 3, 1992




The TIFF CIELAB Fields

                             PhotometricInterpretation
                             Tag     = 262 (106.H)
                             Type = SHORT
                             N       =1


                         8 = 1976 CIE L*a*b*




                             Usage of other Fields.
                             BitsPerSample: 8
                             SamplesPerPixel - ExtraSamples: 3 for L*a*b*, 1 implies L* only, for mono-
                             chrome data.
                             Compression: same as other multi-bit formats. JPEG compression applies.
                             PlanarConfiguration: both chunky and planar data could be supported.
                             WhitePoint: does not apply
                             PrimaryChromaticities: does not apply.
                             TransferFunction: does not apply
                             Alpha Channel information will follow the lead of other data types.
                             The reference white for this data type is the perfect reflecting diffuser (100%
                             diffuse reflectance at all visible wavelengths). The L* range is from 0 (perfect
                             absorbing black) to 100 (perfect reflecting diffuse white). The a* and b* ranges
                             will be represented as signed 8 bit values having the range -127 to +127.


Converting between RGB and CIELAB, a Caveat
                             The above CIELAB formulae are derived from CIE XYZ. Converting from
                             CIELAB to RGB requires an additional set of formulae for converting between
                             RGB and XYZ. For standard NTSC primaries these are:
                             0.60700.17400.2000                  R            X
                             0.29900.58700.1140            *     G      =     Y
                             0.00000.06601.1110                  B            Z
                             Generally, D65 illumination is used and a perfect reflecting diffuser is used for the
                             reference white.
                             Since CIELAB is not a directly displayable format, some conversion to RGB will
                             be required. While look-up table accelerated CIELAB to RGB conversion is
                             certainly possible and fast, TIFF writers may choose to include a low resolution
                             RGB subfile as an integral part of TIFF CIELAB.


                                                  111

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 Color Difference Measurements in CIELAB The differences between two colors in L*, a*, and b* are denoted by DL*, Da*, and Db*, respectively, with the total (3-dimensional) color difference represented as: ∆E*ab = [(∆E*)2+(∆a*)2+(∆b*)2]1/2. This color difference can also be expressed in terms of L*, C*, and a measure of hue. In this case, hab is not used because it is an angular measure and cannot be combined with L* and C* directly. A linear-distance form of hue is used instead: CIE 1976 a,b hue-difference, ∆H*ab ∆H*ab = [(∆E*)2-(∆L*)2-(∆C*)2]1/2. where DC* is the chroma difference between the two colors. The total color dif- ference expression using this hue-difference is: ∆E*ab = [(∆L*)2+(∆H*)2+(∆b*)2]1/2. It is important to remember that color difference is 3-dimensional: much more can be learned from a DL*a*b* triplet than from a single DE value. The DL*C*H* form is often the most useful since it gives the error information in a form that has more familiar perception correlates. Caution is in order, however, when using DH* for large hue differences since it is a straight-line approximation of a curved hue distance. The Merits of CIELAB Colorimetric. First and foremost, CIELAB is colorimetric. It is traceable to the internationally- recognized standard CIE 1931 Standard Observer. This insures that it encodes color in a manner that is accurately modeled after the human vision system. Col- ors seen as matching are encoded identically, and colors seen as not matching are encoded differently. CIELAB provides an unambiguous definition of color with- out the necessity of additional information such as with RGB (primary chromaticities, white point, and gamma curves). Device Independent. Unlike RGB spaces which associate closely with physical phosphor colors, CIELAB contains no device association. CIELAB is not tailored for one device or device type at the expense of all others. 112

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 Full Color Gamut. Any one image or imaging device usually encounters a very limited subset of the entire range of humanly-perceptible color. Collectively, however, these images and devices span a much larger gamut of color. A truly versatile exchange color space should encompass all of these colors, ideally providing support for all vis- ible color. RGB, PhotoYCC, YCbCr, and other display spaces suffer from gamut limitations that exclude significant regions of easily printable colors. CIELAB is defined for all visible color. Efficiency A good exchange space will maximize accuracy of translations between itself and other spaces. It will represent colors compactly for a given accuracy. These at- tributes are provided through visual uniformity. One of the greatest disadvantages of the classic CIE system (and RGB systems as well) is that colors within it are not equally spaced visually. Encoding full-color images in a linear-intensity space, such as the typical RGB space or, especially, the XYZ space, requires a very large range (greater than 8-bits/primary) to eliminate banding artifacts. Adopting a non- linear RGB space improves the efficiency but not nearly to the extent as with a perceptually uniform space where these problems are nearly eliminated. A uni- form space is also more efficiently compressed (see below). Public Domain / Single Standard CIELAB maintains no preferential attachments to any private organization. Its existence as a single standard leaves no room for ambiguity. Since 1976, CIELAB has continually gained popularity as a widely-accepted and heavily-used standard. Luminance/Chrominance Separation. The advantages for image size compression made possible by having a separate lightness or luminance channel are immense. Many such spaces exist. The degree to which the luminance information is fully-isolated into a single channel is an important consideration. Recent studies (Kasson and Plouffe of IBM) support CIELAB as a leading candidate placing it above CIELUV, YIQ, YUV, YCC, and XYZ. Other advantages support a separate lightness or luminance channel. Tone and contrast editing and detail enhancement are most easily accomplished with such a channel. Conversion to a black and white representation is also easiest with this type of space. When the chrominance channels are encoded as opponents as with CIELAB, there are other compression, image manipulation, and white point handling ad- vantages. 113

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 Compressibility (Data). Opponent spaces such as CIELAB are inherently more compressible than tristimulus spaces such as RGB. The chroma content of an image can be com- pressed to a greater extent, without objectionable loss, than can the lightness con- tent. The opponent arrangement of CIELAB allows for spatial subsampling and efficent compression using JPEG. Compressibility (Gamut). Adjusting the color range of an image to match the capabilities of the intended output device is a critical function within computational color reproduction. Lu- minance/chrominance separation, especially when provided in a polar form, is desirable for facilitating gamut compression. Accurate gamut compression in a tri-linear color space is difficult. CIELAB has a polar form (metric hue angle, and metric chroma, described be- low) that serves compression needs fairly well. Because CIELAB is not perfectly uniform, problems can arise when compressing along constant hue lines. Notice- able hue errors are sometimes introduced. This problem is no less severe with other contending color spaces. This polar form also provides advantages for local color editing of images. The polar form is not proposed as part of the TIFF addition. Getting the Most from CIELAB Image Editors The advantages of image editing within a perceptually uniform polar color space are tremendous. A detailed description of these advantages is beyond the scope of this section. As previously mentioned, many common tonal manipulation tasks are most efficiently performed when only a single channel is affected. Edge en- hancement, contrast adjustment, and general tone-curve manipulation all ideally affect only the lightness component of an image. A perceptual polar space works excellently for specifying a color range for mask- ing purposes. For example, a red shirt can be quickly changed to a green shirt without drawing an outline mask. The operation can be performed with a loosely, quickly-drawn mask region combined with a hue (and perhaps chroma) range that encompasses the shirt’s colors. The hue component of the shirt can then be ad- justed, leaving the lightness and chroma detail in place. Color cast adjustment is easily realized by shifting either or both of the chroma channels over the entire image or blending them over the region of interest. Converting from CIELAB to a device specific space For fast conversion to an RGB display, CIELAB can be decoded using 3x3 matrixing followed by gamma correction. The computational complexity required 114

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 for accurate CRT display is the same with CIELAB as with extended luminance- chrominance spaces. Converting CIELAB for accurate printing on CMYK devices requires computa- tional complexity no greater than with accurate conversion from any other colori- metric space. Gamut compression becomes one of the more significant tasks for any such conversion. 115

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 Part 3: Appendices Part 3 contains additional information that is not part of the TIFF specification, but may be of use to developers. 116

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 Appendix A: TIFF Tags Sorted by Number TagName Decimal Hex Type Number of values NewSubfileType 254 FE LONG 1 SubfileType 255 FF SHORT 1 ImageWidth 256 100 SHORT or LONG 1 ImageLength 257 101 SHORT or LONG 1 BitsPerSample 258 102 SHORT SamplesPerPixel Compression 259 103 SHORT 1 Uncompressed 1 CCITT 1D 2 Group 3 Fax 3 Group 4 Fax 4 LZW 5 JPEG 6 PackBits 32773 PhotometricInterpretation 262 106 SHORT 1 WhiteIsZero 0 BlackIsZero 1 RGB 2 RGB Palette 3 Transparency mask 4 CMYK 5 YCbCr 6 CIELab 8 Threshholding 263 107 SHORT 1 CellWidth 264 108 SHORT 1 CellLength 265 109 SHORT 1 FillOrder 266 10A SHORT 1 DocumentName 269 10D ASCII ImageDescription 270 10E ASCII Make 271 10F ASCII Model 272 110 ASCII StripOffsets 273 111 SHORT or LONG StripsPerImage Orientation 274 112 SHORT 1 SamplesPerPixel 277 115 SHORT 1 RowsPerStrip 278 116 SHORT or LONG 1 StripByteCounts 279 117 LONG or SHORT StripsPerImage MinSampleValue 280 118 SHORT SamplesPerPixel MaxSampleValue 281 119 SHORT SamplesPerPixel XResolution 282 11A RATIONAL 1 YResolution 283 11B RATIONAL 1 PlanarConfiguration 284 11C SHORT 1 PageName 285 11D ASCII XPosition 286 11E RATIONAL YPosition 287 11F RATIONAL FreeOffsets 288 120 LONG FreeByteCounts 289 121 LONG GrayResponseUnit 290 122 SHORT 1 117

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 GrayResponseCurve 291 123 SHORT 2**BitsPerSample T4Options 292 124 LONG 1 T6Options 293 125 LONG 1 ResolutionUnit 296 128 SHORT 1 PageNumber 297 129 SHORT 2 TransferFunction 301 12D SHORT {1 or SamplesPerPixel}* 2** BitsPerSample Software 305 131 ASCII DateTime 306 132 ASCII 20 Artist 315 13B ASCII HostComputer 316 13C ASCII Predictor 317 13D SHORT 1 WhitePoint 318 13E RATIONAL 2 PrimaryChromaticities 319 13F RATIONAL 6 ColorMap 320 140 SHORT 3 * (2**BitsPerSample) HalftoneHints 321 141 SHORT 2 TileWidth 322 142 SHORT or LONG 1 TileLength 323 143 SHORT or LONG 1 TileOffsets 324 144 LONG TilesPerImage TileByteCounts 325 145 SHORT or LONG TilesPerImage InkSet 332 14C SHORT 1 InkNames 333 14D ASCII total number of charac ters in all ink name strings, including zeros NumberOfInks 334 14E SHORT 1 DotRange 336 150 BYTE or SHORT 2, or 2* NumberOfInks TargetPrinter 337 151 ASCII any ExtraSamples 338 152 BYTE number of extra compo- nents per pixel SampleFormat 339 153 SHORT SamplesPerPixel SMinSampleValue 340 154 Any SamplesPerPixel SMaxSampleValue 341 155 Any SamplesPerPixel TransferRange 342 156 SHORT 6 JPEGProc 512 200 SHORT 1 JPEGInterchangeFormat 513 201 LONG 1 JPEGInterchangeFormatLngth 514 202 LONG 1 JPEGRestartInterval 515 203 SHORT 1 JPEGLosslessPredictors 517 205 SHORT SamplesPerPixel JPEGPointTransforms 518 206 SHORT SamplesPerPixel JPEGQTables 519 207 LONG SamplesPerPixel JPEGDCTables 520 208 LONG SamplesPerPixel JPEGACTables 521 209 LONG SamplesPerPixel YCbCrCoefficients 529 211 RATIONAL 3 YCbCrSubSampling 530 212 SHORT 2 YCbCrPositioning 531 213 SHORT 1 ReferenceBlackWhite 532 214 LONG 2*SamplesPerPixel Copyright 33432 8298 ASCII Any 118

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 Appendix B: Operating System Considerations Extensions and Filetypes The recommended MS-DOS, UNIX, and OS/2 file extension for TIFF files is “.TIF”. On an Apple Macintosh computer, the recommended Filetype is “TIFF”. It is a good idea to also name TIFF files with a “.TIF” extension so that they can easily imported if transferred to a different operating system. 119

TIFF 6.0 Specification Final—June 3, 1992 Index Symbols CCITT 49 II 13 JPEG 95 image 28 42 13 LZW 57 image file directory 13, 14 Modified Huffman 43 image file header 13 A PackBits 42 ImageDescription 34 Adobe Developer Support 8 Copyright 31 ImageLength 18, 27, 34 alpha data 31 Count 14, 15, 16 ImageWidth 18, 27, 34 associated 77 InkNames 70 ANSI IT8 71 D InkSet 70 Appendices 116 DateTime 31 Artist 28 J default values 28 ASCII 15 Differencing Predictor 64 JPEG compression 95 DocumentName 55 baseline 95 B DotRange 71 discrete cosine trans- Baseline TIFF 11 DOUBLE 16 form 95 big-endian 13 Duff, Tom 79 entropy coding 98 BitsPerSample 22, 29 lossless processes 100 BlackIsZero 17, 37 E quantization 97 BYTE data type 15 JPEGACTables 107 ExtraSamples 31, 77 JPEGDCTables 107 C F JPEGInterchangeFormat 105 JPEGInterchangeFormatLength 105 CCITT 17, 30, 49 Facsimile 49 JPEGLosslessPredictors 106 CellLength 29 file extension 119 JPEGPointTransforms 106 CellWidth 29 filetype 119 JPEGProc 104 chunky format 38 FillOrder 32 JPEGQTables 107 CIELAB images 110 FLOAT 16 JPEGRestartInterval 105 clarifications 6 FreeByteCounts 33 Class B 21 FreeOffsets 33 K Class G 22 Class P 23 G no entries Class R 25 GrayResponseCurve 33, 73, 85 L Classes 7 GrayResponseUnit 33 CMYK Images 69 little-endian 13 Group 3 17, 30 ColorMap 23, 29 LONG data type 15 Group3Options 51 ColorResponseCurves. See LZW compression 57 Group4Options 52 TransferFunction Compatibility 7 H M compliance 12 Make 35 component 28 HalftoneHints 72 matting. See alpha data: associ- compositing. See alpha data: Hexadecimal 12 ated associated high fidelity color 69 MaxComponentValue 35 compression 17, 30 HostComputer 34 MaxSampleValue. See I MaxComponentValue MinComponentValue 35 IFD. See image file directory MinSampleValue. See 120

Previous Next